yessir, that is true. i got removed because i said i would not lay off sheepboy untill he was gone. i saw him for what he was thru a couple nasty emails i got myself. i totally supported terry, along with many others (like jeffc) who wanted the problem squashed fast, and for it my privledges were removed "temporarily" as a punishment. then they were removed permanently when i voiced, in an ever so kind and non foul way (LMAO!) what i thought about being punished because i was standing up for senior forum members over a newbie with an attitude. glad to see most of his rampage was done on the other forum and not here. also got some personal gratification when he was finally banned and i got the big ole "i told you so!". never got an apology, probably never will, but i got my i told you so. oh yeah, i also shared privileged moderator information with terry, because we all know hes not smart enough to figure things out himself. i must have told him..lolololol

i think in this case things would go better if jimmy was a little more direct and to the point, answer the question with supportable fact, or say its simply from personal experience. no matter how informative the post is, even i have lost interest and quit reading before ever getting to the point at times. they can be long winded. also, understand terry is and can be very brash in statements. hes the same way on the phone, just the way he is, dont take it personal when he asks for proof. if it didnt get such a rise, it probably would happen so much.

far as terrys end goes, dont be a richard cerebellum. not every statement needs to be prooven to be believed. numerous people take you at your word every day without proof, and your as full of caca as any of us. if you see an inaccurate statement being pulled off as fact, say so with the facts to back it up and let the readers decide who to believe. doesnt need to turn into the inevitable whizzin match that detracts from the original purpose of the post...regardless how entertaining it is.