1961-71 Dodge Sweptline Truck Forum

Sweptline Showcase

Sponsored Links

There was quite a good conversation about core hole plugs but I was surprised nobody said anything about "surge coils". What does the parts book call a clutch line? Its a pet peave of mine as it is with some others on here that names get changed and passed on to an unsuspecting next gener 
avatar
Re: Terminology
Posted by: JimmieD (66.81.122.---)
Posts: 1,090
Date: September 07, 2009 08:19AM

I think it's obvious from the several pages on the subject that you guys may not understand a whole lot about the science of hydraulics. You know a whole lot more than the average guy about the nuts & bolts part, how to service, repair or install, or even modify, but not the fluid engineering & science of it. If you do have a background in Fluid Engineering say so, okay?

As it mentions at the top of that linked page, 'Clutch Line Modification - Removing Damper Loop'. The damper loop dampens surge [shock waves] in the hydraulic line.

He then mentions, "For some this mod is done purely because they like the stiff, live feeling of the pedal afterwards. You have a closer connection with what your clutch is doing." By that he is saying that the stock, original damper loop works so well in dampening surge effects that it takes away clutch 'feel', or direct feedback. Clutch has stiff, live feedback afterwards because dampening is removed. The dampening comes from the Damper Loop, mentioned at top of his page, which is going to be removed.

"The hard line from the clutch master cylinder comes down to the lower block. This block has a loop back line that acts like a surge tank, taking pressure off the system. This is what causes the weakness. The short hard line then routes to the soft slave cylinder line. What we will be doing is eliminating the loop back and both blocks."

There he states that the loop back line 'acts as a surge tank, taking pressure off system'. If you will do some research to educate yourselves you'll find that a surge tank is used to eliminate or dampen surge, which surge is shock waves pulsing through the fluid. In order to give immediate feedback in clutch pedal feel and in order to increase hydraulic pressure to a stiffer clutch he is going to remove the surge damper loop, which 'acts like a surge tank'. You can see the damper loop in first & second picture there. In third picture it's shown as removed.

He then removes the loop line, as in the damper loop line, and plumbs the hydraulic line direct, without a damper. In the final picture you can see the new brake line, and the distribution block from old setup, where the surge damper loop which has been removed was connected.

The science or engineering of it is that a loop in the hydraulic tubing carrying fluid slows down the velocity of the fluid because of the bend in the loop. That loop, slowing down velocity of fluid, takes away some of the direct feedback to clutch pedal.

I posted links to many pages of information on that subject along with the formulas or equations to calculate velocity change. If you did the math according to those formulas and your calculations show that the science of it is incorrect, then please post the errors.

If you did not do the math or cannot do the math then how can you say that a damper loop - surge loop - surge coil [all the same function] in a hydraulic line does not slow down surge or shock waves in a hydraulic system?

Did you guys do the math & calculate?

Do you understand the fluid science/engineering of surge loop dampening?

Or is it that this series of pages on the subject is the first you've heard of it? [That certainly appears to be the case]

I'm not talking about nuts & bolts stuff of swapping parts, rebuilding automotive brakes, replacing worn components etc. Do you have direct experience in hydraulics engineering & fluid science to state that a surge loop is invalid as a way to dampen hydraulic surge?

If you do have the ENGINEERING BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE to back up what you're saying then please say so.

If you do not have the ENGINEERING BACKGROUND EXPERIENCE then please say so.

I'm not looking for insults swapped or tempers pumped up here, just the simple facts & answers to my simple questions, thanks.

Navigate: Previous MessageNext Message
Options: ReplyQuote


Subject Views Written By Posted
Terminology 1577 White Fargo 09/06/2009 01:33AM
Re: Terminology 645 mopat 09/06/2009 09:34AM
Re: Terminology 682 White Fargo 09/06/2009 06:09PM
Re: Terminology 632 MoparNorm 09/06/2009 10:05AM
Re: Terminology 623 JimmieD 09/06/2009 01:45PM
Re: Terminology 588 PwrWgnDrvr 09/06/2009 04:01PM
Re: Terminology 610 JimmieD 09/06/2009 08:09PM
Re: Terminology 568 JimmieD 09/06/2009 09:31PM
Re: Terminology 627 Gordo 09/06/2009 05:22PM
Re: Terminology 660 JimmieD 09/06/2009 09:24PM
Re: Terminology 576 PwrWgnDrvr 09/06/2009 10:26PM
Re: Terminology 639 White Fargo 09/07/2009 01:11AM
Re: Terminology 688 JimmieD 09/06/2009 09:36PM
Re: Terminology 663 JimmieD 09/06/2009 11:07PM
Re: Terminology 614 PwrWgnDrvr 09/07/2009 12:01AM
Re: Terminology 699 PwrWgnDrvr 09/07/2009 12:09AM
Re: Terminology 544 JimmieD 09/07/2009 12:04AM
Re: Terminology 596 PwrWgnDrvr 09/07/2009 12:14AM
Re: Terminology 638 JimmieD 09/07/2009 08:19AM
Re: Terminology 659 PwrWgnDrvr 09/07/2009 09:17AM
Re: Terminology 533 JimmieD 09/07/2009 11:30AM
Jimmie you are WRONG, AGAIN 689 PwrWgnDrvr 09/07/2009 12:14PM
Re: Terminology 721 White Fargo 09/07/2009 06:27PM
I agree George 596 PwrWgnDrvr 09/07/2009 08:02PM
Re: I agree George 498 White Fargo 09/07/2009 08:18PM
Re: Terminology 782 JimmieD 09/07/2009 11:07PM
Re: Terminology 632 White Fargo 09/07/2009 11:58PM
Re: Stupid Design - EXPLAIN THIS JIMMIE 562 PwrWgnDrvr 09/08/2009 02:00AM
Re: Terminology 582 wideblock 09/09/2009 08:08AM
Re: Terminology 554 JimmieD 09/07/2009 08:39AM
Re: Terminology 648 Keith Jones 09/07/2009 10:02AM
Re: Terminology 522 PwrWgnDrvr 09/07/2009 11:08AM
Re: Terminology 697 JimmieD 09/07/2009 02:53PM
This thread is loopy! 580 beemrmax 09/07/2009 03:44PM
Re: Terminology 598 JimmieD 09/07/2009 04:18PM
I'm actually working on... 619 beemrmax 09/07/2009 04:48PM
Re: Terminology 698 MoparNorm 09/07/2009 09:20PM
Re: Terminology 610 White Fargo 09/07/2009 11:29PM
Re: Terminology 696 MoparNorm 09/07/2009 11:34PM
Re: Terminology 578 JimmieD 09/07/2009 11:18PM
Re: Who's Theory? 594 PwrWgnDrvr 09/08/2009 12:02AM
Re: Who's Theory? 656 White Fargo 09/08/2009 01:44AM
Re: Terminology 584 White Fargo 09/08/2009 01:16AM
I think... 649 beemrmax 09/08/2009 08:20AM
Re: I think... 613 White Fargo 09/08/2009 05:38PM
Re: I think... 713 MoparNorm 09/08/2009 07:14PM
Re: I think... 674 Keith Jones 09/08/2009 08:43PM
Re: I think... 614 PwrWgnDrvr 09/08/2009 08:56PM
Re: Terminology 633 JimmieD 09/09/2009 10:18AM
Fruit Loops! 569 beemrmax 09/09/2009 10:44AM
Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? 616 Russ 09/09/2009 12:32PM
i agree Russ 642 ben 09/09/2009 01:07PM
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? 615 JimC 09/09/2009 01:09PM
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? 626 MoparNorm 09/09/2009 03:07PM
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? 618 PwrWgnDrvr 09/09/2009 03:41PM
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? 627 MoparNorm 09/09/2009 04:32PM
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? 623 PwrWgnDrvr 09/09/2009 07:07PM
Norm 607 Russ 09/09/2009 08:26PM
Russ 586 White Fargo 09/09/2009 07:05PM
Re: Russ 573 Russ 09/09/2009 07:55PM
Re: Russ 684 White Fargo 09/09/2009 08:33PM
Russ, like White Fargo sez; 694 beemrmax 09/10/2009 01:29AM
Re: I'll acknowledge it 625 PwrWgnDrvr 09/10/2009 08:52AM
Thx man! 641 beemrmax 09/10/2009 11:34AM
Re: Terminology 602 JimmieD 09/10/2009 11:32AM
Re: Terminology 557 JimmieD 09/10/2009 12:07PM
Re: Terminology 603 wideblock 09/10/2009 02:01PM
Re: Terminology 672 beemrmax 09/10/2009 02:56PM
Re: Terminology 613 White Fargo 09/10/2009 04:29PM
Re: Terminology 671 PwrWgnDrvr 09/10/2009 04:45PM
LET 649 ben 09/11/2009 08:44AM
IT 747 ben 09/11/2009 08:44AM
GO 553 ben 09/11/2009 08:44AM
Please 619 ben 09/11/2009 08:47AM
Is there a yawning smiley? 754 beemrmax 09/11/2009 10:51AM
This is meant to be humorous 691 White Fargo 09/10/2009 05:42PM
i have a book of Service Bulletins 642 ben 09/11/2009 06:37AM
Re: Terminology 579 Gordo 09/10/2009 08:30PM
. 629 ben 09/11/2009 08:45AM


Array
Sorry, you can't reply to this topic. It has been closed.
This forum powered by Phorum.