Sweptline Showcase
Quote
PwrWgnDrvr
Jimmie, u are mistaken on the design of that datsun system. The "loop" is not in direct line with the flow of fluid to the slave.
Fluid flows to the block, which is really nothing more than a Tee fitting. Fluid goes out one side of the block to the slave and out the other side into the "loop". NOTE: The other end of the "loop" is connected to a different fitting, that looks like another block. NO FLUID flows through that line and out the other end! There is no other line connected to the fitting at the end of the "loop". The "loop" probably has an air trap since it bends vertical and returns to the upper block fitting. Obviously, it cannot be bled, (and filled with fluid), unless there is another bleeder valve on the upper block.
As George said, that line "absorbs" fluid by having an air trap, a spring and piston or some other arrangement to allow flow into that closed line. The whole system is designed no different than any standard surge tank/expansion tank setup that is connected by a TEE at any point in a fluid flow line. Such tanks are common. In fact, the radiator overflow tank on any vehicle is EXACTLY the same principle.
That datsun setup is NOT a bent coil of tubing that somehow affects the operation of the hydraulic system in the way u have been claiming.
It doesnt take an engineer to see and understand that.
Subject | Views | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Terminology | 1578 | White Fargo | 09/06/2009 01:33AM |
Re: Terminology | 645 | mopat | 09/06/2009 09:34AM |
Re: Terminology | 682 | White Fargo | 09/06/2009 06:09PM |
Re: Terminology | 633 | MoparNorm | 09/06/2009 10:05AM |
Re: Terminology | 623 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 01:45PM |
Re: Terminology | 588 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/06/2009 04:01PM |
Re: Terminology | 610 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 08:09PM |
Re: Terminology | 568 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 09:31PM |
Re: Terminology | 628 | Gordo | 09/06/2009 05:22PM |
Re: Terminology | 661 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 09:24PM |
Re: Terminology | 577 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/06/2009 10:26PM |
Re: Terminology | 639 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 01:11AM |
Re: Terminology | 688 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 09:36PM |
Re: Terminology | 663 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 11:07PM |
Re: Terminology | 614 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 12:01AM |
Re: Terminology | 699 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 12:09AM |
Re: Terminology | 544 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 12:04AM |
Re: Terminology | 596 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 12:14AM |
Re: Terminology | 639 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 08:19AM |
Re: Terminology | 660 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 09:17AM |
Re: Terminology | 533 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 11:30AM |
Jimmie you are WRONG, AGAIN | 689 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 12:14PM |
Re: Terminology | 721 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 06:27PM |
George | 596 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 08:02PM |
Re: George | 498 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 08:18PM |
Re: Terminology | 783 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 11:07PM |
Re: Terminology | 632 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 11:58PM |
Re: Stupid Design - EXPLAIN THIS JIMMIE | 562 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/08/2009 02:00AM |
Re: Terminology | 582 | wideblock | 09/09/2009 08:08AM |
Re: Terminology | 554 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 08:39AM |
Re: Terminology | 648 | Keith Jones | 09/07/2009 10:02AM |
Re: Terminology | 522 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 11:08AM |
Re: Terminology | 697 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 02:53PM |
This thread is loopy! | 580 | beemrmax | 09/07/2009 03:44PM |
Re: Terminology | 599 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 04:18PM |
I'm actually working on... | 619 | beemrmax | 09/07/2009 04:48PM |
Re: Terminology | 698 | MoparNorm | 09/07/2009 09:20PM |
Re: Terminology | 610 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 11:29PM |
Re: Terminology | 696 | MoparNorm | 09/07/2009 11:34PM |
Re: Terminology | 578 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 11:18PM |
Re: Who's Theory? | 594 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/08/2009 12:02AM |
Re: Who's Theory? | 656 | White Fargo | 09/08/2009 01:44AM |
Re: Terminology | 584 | White Fargo | 09/08/2009 01:16AM |
I think... | 649 | beemrmax | 09/08/2009 08:20AM |
Re: I think... | 613 | White Fargo | 09/08/2009 05:38PM |
Re: I think... | 713 | MoparNorm | 09/08/2009 07:14PM |
Re: I think... | 674 | Keith Jones | 09/08/2009 08:43PM |
Re: I think... | 614 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/08/2009 08:56PM |
Re: Terminology | 633 | JimmieD | 09/09/2009 10:18AM |
Fruit Loops! | 570 | beemrmax | 09/09/2009 10:44AM |
Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 616 | Russ | 09/09/2009 12:32PM |
i agree Russ | 643 | ben | 09/09/2009 01:07PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 615 | JimC | 09/09/2009 01:09PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 627 | MoparNorm | 09/09/2009 03:07PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 619 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/09/2009 03:41PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 627 | MoparNorm | 09/09/2009 04:32PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 623 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/09/2009 07:07PM |
Norm | 608 | Russ | 09/09/2009 08:26PM |
Russ | 586 | White Fargo | 09/09/2009 07:05PM |
Re: Russ | 574 | Russ | 09/09/2009 07:55PM |
Re: Russ | 684 | White Fargo | 09/09/2009 08:33PM |
Russ, like White Fargo sez; | 694 | beemrmax | 09/10/2009 01:29AM |
Re: I'll acknowledge it | 625 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/10/2009 08:52AM |
Thx man! | 642 | beemrmax | 09/10/2009 11:34AM |
Re: Terminology | 602 | JimmieD | 09/10/2009 11:32AM |
Re: Terminology | 558 | JimmieD | 09/10/2009 12:07PM |
Re: Terminology | 604 | wideblock | 09/10/2009 02:01PM |
Re: Terminology | 672 | beemrmax | 09/10/2009 02:56PM |
Re: Terminology | 613 | White Fargo | 09/10/2009 04:29PM |
Re: Terminology | 671 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/10/2009 04:45PM |
LET | 649 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:44AM |
IT | 747 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:44AM |
GO | 553 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:44AM |
Please | 620 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:47AM |
Is there a yawning smiley? | 754 | beemrmax | 09/11/2009 10:51AM |
This is meant to be humorous | 691 | White Fargo | 09/10/2009 05:42PM |
i have a book of Service Bulletins | 643 | ben | 09/11/2009 06:37AM |
Re: Terminology | 580 | Gordo | 09/10/2009 08:30PM |
. | 629 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:45AM |