Sweptline Showcase
Quote
JimmieD
Sounds like 100% speculation & guess-timate there, Terry, as in "The "loop" probably has an air trap since it bends vertical and returns to the upper block fitting. Obviously, it cannot be bled, (and filled with fluid), unless there is another bleeder valve on the upper block."
"Probably has an air trap..." means you have no idea if it does, doesn't or what is there.
YES, THAT IS CORRECT. I HAVE NO IDEA, AND NEITHER DO U! BECAUSE THE WEBSITE DOES NOT SPECIFY WHAT THE SYSTEM CONSISTS OF!
"As George said, that line "absorbs" fluid by having an air trap, a spring and piston or some other arrangement to allow flow into that closed line. The whole system is designed no different than any standard surge tank/expansion tank setup that is connected by a TEE at any point in a fluid flow line. Such tanks are common. In fact, the radiator overflow tank on any vehicle is EXACTLY the same principle."
Now it not only has an air trap, but also a spring & piston? Source of information on that one?
I LISTED 3 POSSIBILITIES, USING THE WORD OR. I DID NOT SPECIFY WHAT IT HAS, NOR SAY THAT IT HAD BOTH. U OBVIOUSLY HAVE A SERIOUS READING PROBLEM AS WELL AS A SERIOUS COMPREHENSION PROBLEM.
It's physically, mechanically, scientifically impossible for that to be the same as a radiator overflow tank or surge tank/expansion tank in a cooling system.
JIMMIE, U ARE IGNORANT, ARROGANT, BLIND AND APPARENTLY STUPID TOO. A RADIATOR OVERFLOW TANK IS A SURGE TANK.
quote]
Subject | Views | Written By | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Terminology | 1577 | White Fargo | 09/06/2009 01:33AM |
Re: Terminology | 645 | mopat | 09/06/2009 09:34AM |
Re: Terminology | 682 | White Fargo | 09/06/2009 06:09PM |
Re: Terminology | 632 | MoparNorm | 09/06/2009 10:05AM |
Re: Terminology | 623 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 01:45PM |
Re: Terminology | 587 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/06/2009 04:01PM |
Re: Terminology | 610 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 08:09PM |
Re: Terminology | 568 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 09:31PM |
Re: Terminology | 627 | Gordo | 09/06/2009 05:22PM |
Re: Terminology | 659 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 09:24PM |
Re: Terminology | 576 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/06/2009 10:26PM |
Re: Terminology | 639 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 01:11AM |
Re: Terminology | 688 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 09:36PM |
Re: Terminology | 662 | JimmieD | 09/06/2009 11:07PM |
Re: Terminology | 614 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 12:01AM |
Re: Terminology | 699 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 12:09AM |
Re: Terminology | 544 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 12:04AM |
Re: Terminology | 595 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 12:14AM |
Re: Terminology | 638 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 08:19AM |
Re: Terminology | 659 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 09:17AM |
Re: Terminology | 533 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 11:30AM |
Jimmie you are WRONG, AGAIN | 688 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 12:14PM |
Re: Terminology | 721 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 06:27PM |
George | 596 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 08:02PM |
Re: George | 498 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 08:18PM |
Re: Terminology | 782 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 11:07PM |
Re: Terminology | 632 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 11:58PM |
Re: Stupid Design - EXPLAIN THIS JIMMIE | 561 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/08/2009 02:00AM |
Re: Terminology | 582 | wideblock | 09/09/2009 08:08AM |
Re: Terminology | 553 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 08:39AM |
Re: Terminology | 647 | Keith Jones | 09/07/2009 10:02AM |
Re: Terminology | 521 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/07/2009 11:08AM |
Re: Terminology | 697 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 02:53PM |
This thread is loopy! | 580 | beemrmax | 09/07/2009 03:44PM |
Re: Terminology | 598 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 04:18PM |
I'm actually working on... | 619 | beemrmax | 09/07/2009 04:48PM |
Re: Terminology | 698 | MoparNorm | 09/07/2009 09:20PM |
Re: Terminology | 610 | White Fargo | 09/07/2009 11:29PM |
Re: Terminology | 696 | MoparNorm | 09/07/2009 11:34PM |
Re: Terminology | 578 | JimmieD | 09/07/2009 11:18PM |
Re: Who's Theory? | 594 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/08/2009 12:02AM |
Re: Who's Theory? | 656 | White Fargo | 09/08/2009 01:44AM |
Re: Terminology | 584 | White Fargo | 09/08/2009 01:16AM |
I think... | 649 | beemrmax | 09/08/2009 08:20AM |
Re: I think... | 613 | White Fargo | 09/08/2009 05:38PM |
Re: I think... | 712 | MoparNorm | 09/08/2009 07:14PM |
Re: I think... | 673 | Keith Jones | 09/08/2009 08:43PM |
Re: I think... | 614 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/08/2009 08:56PM |
Re: Terminology | 633 | JimmieD | 09/09/2009 10:18AM |
Fruit Loops! | 569 | beemrmax | 09/09/2009 10:44AM |
Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 615 | Russ | 09/09/2009 12:32PM |
i agree Russ | 642 | ben | 09/09/2009 01:07PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 614 | JimC | 09/09/2009 01:09PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 626 | MoparNorm | 09/09/2009 03:07PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 618 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/09/2009 03:41PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 627 | MoparNorm | 09/09/2009 04:32PM |
Re: Does anyone else think this has gone on too long? | 622 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/09/2009 07:07PM |
Norm | 607 | Russ | 09/09/2009 08:26PM |
Russ | 586 | White Fargo | 09/09/2009 07:05PM |
Re: Russ | 573 | Russ | 09/09/2009 07:55PM |
Re: Russ | 684 | White Fargo | 09/09/2009 08:33PM |
Russ, like White Fargo sez; | 693 | beemrmax | 09/10/2009 01:29AM |
Re: I'll acknowledge it | 625 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/10/2009 08:52AM |
Thx man! | 641 | beemrmax | 09/10/2009 11:34AM |
Re: Terminology | 601 | JimmieD | 09/10/2009 11:32AM |
Re: Terminology | 557 | JimmieD | 09/10/2009 12:07PM |
Re: Terminology | 603 | wideblock | 09/10/2009 02:01PM |
Re: Terminology | 672 | beemrmax | 09/10/2009 02:56PM |
Re: Terminology | 613 | White Fargo | 09/10/2009 04:29PM |
Re: Terminology | 671 | PwrWgnDrvr | 09/10/2009 04:45PM |
LET | 649 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:44AM |
IT | 747 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:44AM |
GO | 553 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:44AM |
Please | 619 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:47AM |
Is there a yawning smiley? | 753 | beemrmax | 09/11/2009 10:51AM |
This is meant to be humorous | 691 | White Fargo | 09/10/2009 05:42PM |
i have a book of Service Bulletins | 642 | ben | 09/11/2009 06:37AM |
Re: Terminology | 579 | Gordo | 09/10/2009 08:30PM |
. | 629 | ben | 09/11/2009 08:45AM |